Sample excerpt

Studio due diligence

Two fictional pages showing how operating evidence, technical capability and dependencies can support an investment decision.

Sample report. Fictional example.
Dino SlothStudio due diligence · DS/DIL/02

Decision excerpt · fictional data

Kiteworks Interactive

Capability, delivery and technical risk for a proposed minority investment.

Studio
42 people
Model
AAA co-development
Evidence
Plans, builds, interviews
Confidence
Moderate
Proceed with conditions

Delivery capability is credible. The investment case depends too heavily on one client and three people.

The reviewed work supports the studio's senior Unreal co-development claim, and its last two milestones were accepted. The proposed growth rate is not yet supported by management depth or contracted demand. Resolve the concentration and leadership assumptions before committing to the full plan.

Concentration controls the downside.

The renewal date falls four months after the proposed investment. The operating plan assumes both renewal and expansion before signed scope exists.

6Milestones reviewed
2Builds inspected
8Interviews
3Key-person roles
Kiteworks Interactive · Sample excerpt01 / 02
Dino SlothKiteworks Interactive · Decision risks

Selected findings

PriorityFindingWhy it mattersDecision response
HighLead-client concentrationRenewal is not yet contracted.The forecast assumes expansion before signed scope.Verify renewal and model the downside case.
HighLeadership does not scaleFounders cover sales, escalation and production gaps.Two proposed teams have no experienced delivery owner.Cost leadership before team growth.
MediumRelease knowledge is concentratedOne person owns submission and major engine changes.Absence would put milestones at risk.Pair the role and witness a release.
MediumThe offer outruns the proofEvidence is strongest in Unreal co-development.Full production and live operations remain claims.Reposition around demonstrated capability.
  1. 01
    Verify revenue and renewal assumptions

    Financial diligence owns the conclusion; this review identifies the operating dependency.

    Pre-close
  2. 02
    Interview the lead client

    Test renewal intent, delivery strengths and readiness for wider responsibility.

    Pre-close
  3. 03
    Agree a leadership plan

    Add production and technical ownership instead of treating them as spare founder capacity.

    Condition
  4. 04
    Confirm IP and change-of-control matters

    Provide the dependency list and contract questions to legal counsel.

    Specialist

Review boundary: this is operating and technical diligence. It is not financial, legal, tax, HR or security certification diligence, and it does not value the company or guarantee client renewal.

Kiteworks Interactive · Sample excerpt02 / 02

Assessing a studio?

Send the target, transaction stage and decision date. Specialist work is named in the scope rather than implied.